Expand IntroductionIntroduction
Expand AdministrationAdministration
Expand User InterfaceUser Interface
Expand SOLIDWORKS FundamentalsSOLIDWORKS Fundamentals
Expand Moving from 2D to 3DMoving from 2D to 3D
Expand AssembliesAssemblies
Expand CircuitWorksCircuitWorks
Expand ConfigurationsConfigurations
Expand SOLIDWORKS CostingSOLIDWORKS Costing
Expand Design CheckerDesign Checker
Expand Design Studies in SOLIDWORKSDesign Studies in SOLIDWORKS
Expand Detailing and DrawingsDetailing and Drawings
Expand DFMXpressDFMXpress
Expand DriveWorksXpressDriveWorksXpress
Expand FloXpressFloXpress
Expand SLDXML Data ExchangeSLDXML Data Exchange
Expand Import and ExportImport and Export
Expand Model DisplayModel Display
Expand Mold DesignMold Design
Expand Motion StudiesMotion Studies
Expand Parts and FeaturesParts and Features
Expand RoutingRouting
Expand Sheet MetalSheet Metal
Collapse SimulationSimulation
Expand SimulationXpressSimulationXpress
Expand SketchingSketching
Expand SOLIDWORKS MBDSOLIDWORKS MBD
Expand SOLIDWORKS UtilitiesSOLIDWORKS Utilities
Expand SOLIDWORKS SustainabilitySOLIDWORKS Sustainability
Expand TolerancingTolerancing
Expand TolAnalystTolAnalyst
Expand ToolboxToolbox
Expand WeldmentsWeldments
Expand Workgroup PDMWorkgroup PDM
Expand TroubleshootingTroubleshooting
Glossary
Hide Table of Contents

Multiple Fatigue Events

Evaluating alternating stresses for multiple fatigue events depends on whether the events occur randomly or independently (no interaction between events). You can set the type of interaction between multiple fatigue events in the Fatigue dialog box.

No Interaction SOLIDWORKS Simulation evaluates the alternating stress separately for each event. Each fatigue event occurs independently from the other events. The damage factors from all events are added sequentially.
Random Interaction The software considers the possibility of mixing peak stresses from different events for the evaluation of alternating stresses.

The software evaluates the maximum alternating stress by considering all possible pairs of fatigue events at each node. It then uses the Miner’s rule and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code to define a set of modified fatigue events.

The random interaction between events option predicts a higher damage factor than applying the defined events sequentially, unless the stress peaks from different events are marginally different. In such cases, it is recommended to run two fatigue studies; one study with no interaction between events and the other study with random interaction. The results can reveal that one option gives higher damage at some locations while the other option gives higher damage at other locations.


Provide feedback on this topic

SOLIDWORKS welcomes your feedback concerning the presentation, accuracy, and thoroughness of the documentation. Use the form below to send your comments and suggestions about this topic directly to our documentation team. The documentation team cannot answer technical support questions. Click here for information about technical support.

* Required

 
*Email:  
Subject:   Feedback on Help Topics
Page:   Multiple Fatigue Events
*Comment:  
*   I acknowledge I have read and I hereby accept the privacy policy under which my Personal Data will be used by Dassault Systèmes

Print Topic

Select the scope of content to print:

x

We have detected you are using a browser version older than Internet Explorer 7. For optimized display, we suggest upgrading your browser to Internet Explorer 7 or newer.

 Never show this message again
x

Web Help Content Version: SOLIDWORKS 2016 SP05

To disable Web help from within SOLIDWORKS and use local help instead, click Help > Use SOLIDWORKS Web Help.

To report problems encountered with the Web help interface and search, contact your local support representative. To provide feedback on individual help topics, use the “Feedback on this topic” link on the individual topic page.