Expand IntroductionIntroduction
Expand AdministrationAdministration
Expand User InterfaceUser Interface
Expand SOLIDWORKS FundamentalsSOLIDWORKS Fundamentals
Expand Moving from 2D to 3DMoving from 2D to 3D
Expand AssembliesAssemblies
Expand CircuitWorksCircuitWorks
Expand ConfigurationsConfigurations
Expand SOLIDWORKS CostingSOLIDWORKS Costing
Expand Design CheckerDesign Checker
Expand Design Studies in SOLIDWORKSDesign Studies in SOLIDWORKS
Expand Detailing and DrawingsDetailing and Drawings
Expand DFMXpressDFMXpress
Expand DriveWorksXpressDriveWorksXpress
Expand FloXpressFloXpress
Expand SLDXML Data ExchangeSLDXML Data Exchange
Expand Import and ExportImport and Export
Expand Model DisplayModel Display
Expand Mold DesignMold Design
Expand Motion StudiesMotion Studies
Expand Parts and FeaturesParts and Features
Expand RoutingRouting
Expand Sheet MetalSheet Metal
Collapse SimulationSimulation
Expand SimulationXpressSimulationXpress
Expand SketchingSketching
Expand Sustainability ProductsSustainability Products
Expand SOLIDWORKS MBDSOLIDWORKS MBD
Expand SOLIDWORKS UtilitiesSOLIDWORKS Utilities
Expand TolerancingTolerancing
Expand TolAnalystTolAnalyst
Expand ToolboxToolbox
Expand WeldmentsWeldments
Expand Workgroup PDMWorkgroup PDM
Expand TroubleshootingTroubleshooting
Glossary
Hide Table of Contents

Example of Random Interaction for Constant Amplitude Fatigue Events

When you select Random interaction, the software mixes peak stresses from different events to evaluate the alternating stress.

Different loading events can interact in such a way that the maximum positive peak stress from one event combined with the minimum peak stress from another event produces a larger alternating stress than either one of the fatigue events.

The Random interaction option predicts a higher fatigue damage factor than applying the different fatigue events sequentially (No Interaction). The Random interaction method is based on the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

For example, consider these three events:
  Event 1 Event 2 Event 3
Number of cycles 80,000 230,000 120,000
Min Stress 0 -300 MPa 0
Max Stress 500 MPa 0 200 Mpa

If Random interaction is considered, the sequence of events that results in the largest stress variation is when one cycle of Event 2 proceeds each cycle of Event 1. In this case the stress fluctuates from 500 MPa (max stress of Event 1) to -300 MPa (min stress of Event 2), resulting in a 800 MPa stress variation (alternating stress is 400 MPa and average stress is 100 MPa).

Since there are only 80,000 cycles of Event 1, this sequence of events can happen only 80,000 times. After the first sequence of events, there are only 150,000 (= 230,000 - 80,000) cycles remaining of Event 2.

For the next event sequence, let's assume that one cycle of Event 3 proceeds each of the remaining cycles of Event 2, resulting in a stress variation of 500 MPa (alternating stress of 250 MPa and an average stress of -50 MPa).

Since there are only 120,000 cycles of Event 3, the second sequence of events can happen 120,000 times.

Finally, 30,000 cycles of Event 2 are left. This corresponds to an alternating stress of 150 MPa, with an average stress of -150 MPa.

  Random Interaction
Event 1 followed by Event 2 80,000 cycles of a 400 MPa alternating stress with an average stress of 100 MPa
Event 2 followed by Event 3 120,000 cycles of a 250 MPa alternating stress with an average stress of -50 MPa
Event 2 30,000 cycles of a 150 MPa alternating stress with an average stress of -150 MPa
  No Interaction
Event 1 80,000 cycles of a 250 MPa alternating stress with an average stress of 250 MPa
Event 2 230,000 cycles of a 150 MPa alternating stress with an average stress of -150 MPa
Event 3 120,000 cycles of a 100 MPa alternating stress with an average stress of 100 MPa
  • For studies with fatigue events referencing multiple studies, the program calculates peak stresses based on the Random Interaction option even if you select the No interaction option.
  • The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code recommends using the Random Interaction option. It is generally more conservative (predicts higher damage) than the No interaction option.


Provide feedback on this topic

SOLIDWORKS welcomes your feedback concerning the presentation, accuracy, and thoroughness of the documentation. Use the form below to send your comments and suggestions about this topic directly to our documentation team. The documentation team cannot answer technical support questions. Click here for information about technical support.

* Required

 
*Email:  
Subject:   Feedback on Help Topics
Page:   Example of Random Interaction for Constant Amplitude Fatigue Events
*Comment:  
*   I acknowledge I have read and I hereby accept the privacy policy under which my Personal Data will be used by Dassault Systèmes

Print Topic

Select the scope of content to print:

x

We have detected you are using a browser version older than Internet Explorer 7. For optimized display, we suggest upgrading your browser to Internet Explorer 7 or newer.

 Never show this message again
x

Web Help Content Version: SOLIDWORKS 2015 SP05

To disable Web help from within SOLIDWORKS and use local help instead, click Help > Use SOLIDWORKS Web Help.

To report problems encountered with the Web help interface and search, contact your local support representative. To provide feedback on individual help topics, use the “Feedback on this topic” link on the individual topic page.